Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      IGB 7.1

      Description

      selects a track. open annotation tab and click on 'Lock...' in track height panel. This means lock the height of tier in number of pixels. When a user changes the stack height, the track height remains constant but number of stack inside the track changes.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            ann.loraine Ann Loraine created issue -
            alyssa Alyssa Gulledge (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Project IGB 7.1 [ 10240 ] IGB 7.0 [ 10140 ]
            Key IGBD-131 IGBC-477
            hiralv Hiral Vora (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Hiral Vora [ hiralv ] Alyssa Gulledge [ alyssa ]
            Description As always, re-assign or not as you see fit.

            Implement a new interaction "squish," same functionality as IGV and UCSC Genome Browser "squish":

            We probably already have the basic functionality in place - this request mainly addresses the UI aspects.

            How it works from the user's perspective:

            User selects a track.
            User clicks a short-cut button "squish" or right-clicks a track label. "Squish" option is next to "collapsed" in right-click menu.

            When setting is checked, max expand goes to "unlimited" (0) but the track height stays the same.

            When setting is unchecked, max expand goes back to what it was previously and the track height stays the same.

            For demo in IGV, make a NGS Viewer VM (iplant), go to TAIR10 genome, load an RNASeq data set, and right-click something in the data view. Choose the option "squish."
            THIS IS ORIGINAL IDEA OF DR. LORAINE

            As always, re-assign or not as you see fit.

            Implement a new interaction "squish," same functionality as IGV and UCSC Genome Browser "squish":

            We probably already have the basic functionality in place - this request mainly addresses the UI aspects.

            How it works from the user's perspective:

            User selects a track.
            User clicks a short-cut button "squish" or right-clicks a track label. "Squish" option is next to "collapsed" in right-click menu.

            When setting is checked, max expand goes to "unlimited" (0) but the track height stays the same.

            When setting is unchecked, max expand goes back to what it was previously and the track height stays the same.

            For demo in IGV, make a NGS Viewer VM (iplant), go to TAIR10 genome, load an RNASeq data set, and right-click something in the data view. Choose the option "squish."


            BUT LATER THIS HAS CHANGED TO FOLLOWING

            IDEA : Implement a lock tier on tier glyph.

            IMPLEMENTATION DETAIL:
            A user would right click and select lock tier. This would lock the height of the tier.
            This means height of tier in number of pixels remains same. It should not be affected by max depth. When a user changes the max depth, the height remains constant but number of stack changes.
            alyssa Alyssa Gulledge (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
            Assignee Alyssa Gulledge [ alyssa ]
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            alyssa Alyssa Gulledge (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            alyssa Alyssa Gulledge (Inactive) made changes -
            Project IGB 7.0 [ 10140 ] Bug Repository [ 10030 ]
            Key IGBC-477 BUG-574
            Issue Type New Feature [ 2 ] Bug [ 1 ]
            richard Richard Linchangco (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Closed [ 6 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
            alyssa Alyssa Gulledge (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to BUG-681 [ BUG-681 ]
            alyssa Alyssa Gulledge (Inactive) made changes -
            Summary implement squish Lock track height function
            Description THIS IS ORIGINAL IDEA OF DR. LORAINE

            As always, re-assign or not as you see fit.

            Implement a new interaction "squish," same functionality as IGV and UCSC Genome Browser "squish":

            We probably already have the basic functionality in place - this request mainly addresses the UI aspects.

            How it works from the user's perspective:

            User selects a track.
            User clicks a short-cut button "squish" or right-clicks a track label. "Squish" option is next to "collapsed" in right-click menu.

            When setting is checked, max expand goes to "unlimited" (0) but the track height stays the same.

            When setting is unchecked, max expand goes back to what it was previously and the track height stays the same.

            For demo in IGV, make a NGS Viewer VM (iplant), go to TAIR10 genome, load an RNASeq data set, and right-click something in the data view. Choose the option "squish."


            BUT LATER THIS HAS CHANGED TO FOLLOWING

            IDEA : Implement a lock tier on tier glyph.

            IMPLEMENTATION DETAIL:
            A user would right click and select lock tier. This would lock the height of the tier.
            This means height of tier in number of pixels remains same. It should not be affected by max depth. When a user changes the max depth, the height remains constant but number of stack changes.
            selects a track. open annotation tab and click on 'Lock...' in track height panel. This means lock the height of tier in number of pixels. When a user changes the stack height, the track height remains constant but number of stack inside the track changes.
            alyssa Alyssa Gulledge (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopened [ 4 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                ann.loraine Ann Loraine
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                0 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: