Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Labels:None
Description
From: Arnaud Ceol <arnaud.ceol@iit.it>
To: Ann Loraine <Ann.Loraine@uncc.edu>
CC: Norris, David <dcnorris@uncc.edu>; Mason Meyer <mmeyer20@uncc.edu>
Date: Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:21 PM
Subject: IGB slow with large quickloads, even if no annotation is selected
Hi,
I have a strange problem with large quickload servers. I have created a quickload with all results from our group ( > 7000 annotations). As soon as I add it to the data sources, IGB becomes really slow, particularly when searching/zooming. What is strange is that it happens event if I have not loaded any of the annotations of this quickload server. If I remove it it becomes fast again.
Example:
1) Open IGB, select my species
2) Go to advanced search, enter myc, search
3) double click on any of the results -> zoom finish in < 1 second
4) Add my quickload server
5) Go to advanced search, enter myc, search
6) double click on any of the results -> zoom finish in > 4 seconds
7) Remove my quickload server
8) Go to advanced search, enter myc, search
9) double click on any of the results -> zoom finish in < 1 seconds
The same speed difference is observed if I used the method "ServiceManager.getInstance().getService().zoomToCoord()" from my plugins.
Do you know why this happens? Is the quickload server searched even if none of the annotations is selected?
thanks,
Arnaud
PS: Here is one example line of the annot.xml file: <file title="users/aceol/secondary/624-test_peaks.bb" name="http://127.0.0.1/~aceol/quickload/secondary//624/bed/test_peaks.bb"/>
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
IGBF-1114 Enabling a large Quickload site may cause delays during a jump-zoom event
-
- Closed
-
From: Arnaud Ceol <arnaud.ceol@iit.it>
To: Mason Meyer <mmeyer20@uncc.edu>
CC: Norris, David <dcnorris@uncc.edu>; Ann Loraine <Ann.Loraine@uncc.edu>
Date: Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: IGB slow with large quickloads, even if no annotation is selected
Hello again Arnaud,
Thanks for letting us know that you were also experiencing this problem on Linux, because while testing, we could reproduce the problem on Windows and Mac, but not on Linux. Fortunately, it looks like David has found a solution to your problem and we are planning to do a minor release soon to fix this bug, along with a few others. I will be sure to contact you again around the time of release to verify that the issue you were experiencing has been resolved. Thank you very much for your help in finding this issue. I look forward to speaking with you again soon.
Thanks again,
Mason Meyer