From: Ann Loraine <aloraine@uncc.edu>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2014 at 1:43 PM
To: "Dingwall, Andrew" <Adingwall@luc.edu>
Subject: Re: current genome annotations
Hi,
I just took a look at the FlyBase Web site.
It looks like they are preparing to release an all-new genome assembly (v6) this summer. Going along with this new assembly release, they’ll also release the version 5.57 genome annotations re-mapped onto the new assembly.
Currently, IGB is showing the April 2006 genome assembly, also called “dm3” and “BDGP Release 5.” From what I can tell, it looks like the April 2006 version is the latest available but will be superseded when the version 6 assembly comes out.
When you visit fruit fly in IGB, a track of annotations labeled “RefGene” automatically load into the viewer. These were taken from the UCSC Genome Informatics Table Browser - they correspond to alignments of RefSeq mRNA records onto the assembly that were done by the UCSC team.
It sounds like it would be far more useful if IGB instead provided access to the FlyBase gene model annotations, which probably people in the field regard as the “canonical” gene models annotations. Does that sound right?
I looked through the FlyBase site and found a GFFv3 file that looks like it has everything I would need to set this up. Mainly I would just need to reformat the file and add some meta-data to it…such as functional annotations.
Also, I wanted to mention that IGB now has a Galaxy integration feature you might find useful. If you have a BAM or BED file in Galaxy, you can click on its name and a link labeled “View in IGB” will appear. The previous link did not work, but we fixed it recently. I’ve been using this feature a lot lately to look at results from various tools available in Galaxy that I didn’t have time (or patience
to install on my local computer. Seems like for smaller genomes like fruit fly or Arabidopsis, Galaxy is an especially nice tool because the files we work with are not too large.
Let me know if you have further suggestions about the fruit fly gene models and assembly! I’ll keep you posted on the progress.
Ann
From: Ann Loraine <aloraine@uncc.edu>
Date: Monday, June 23, 2014 at 1:43 PM
To: "Dingwall, Andrew" <Adingwall@luc.edu>
Subject: Re: current genome annotations
Hi,
I just took a look at the FlyBase Web site.
It looks like they are preparing to release an all-new genome assembly (v6) this summer. Going along with this new assembly release, they’ll also release the version 5.57 genome annotations re-mapped onto the new assembly.
Currently, IGB is showing the April 2006 genome assembly, also called “dm3” and “BDGP Release 5.” From what I can tell, it looks like the April 2006 version is the latest available but will be superseded when the version 6 assembly comes out.
When you visit fruit fly in IGB, a track of annotations labeled “RefGene” automatically load into the viewer. These were taken from the UCSC Genome Informatics Table Browser - they correspond to alignments of RefSeq mRNA records onto the assembly that were done by the UCSC team.
It sounds like it would be far more useful if IGB instead provided access to the FlyBase gene model annotations, which probably people in the field regard as the “canonical” gene models annotations. Does that sound right?
I looked through the FlyBase site and found a GFFv3 file that looks like it has everything I would need to set this up. Mainly I would just need to reformat the file and add some meta-data to it…such as functional annotations.
Also, I wanted to mention that IGB now has a Galaxy integration feature you might find useful. If you have a BAM or BED file in Galaxy, you can click on its name and a link labeled “View in IGB” will appear. The previous link did not work, but we fixed it recently. I’ve been using this feature a lot lately to look at results from various tools available in Galaxy that I didn’t have time (or patience
to install on my local computer. Seems like for smaller genomes like fruit fly or Arabidopsis, Galaxy is an especially nice tool because the files we work with are not too large.
Let me know if you have further suggestions about the fruit fly gene models and assembly! I’ll keep you posted on the progress.
Ann