Details
-
Type:
Task
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:2
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:Spring 9 : 25 May to 8 Jun, Summer 1: 8 Jun - 19 Jun
Description
Final formatting and submission of the paper to the journal.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
-
- Closed
-
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Epic Link |
|
| Story Points | 4 | 2 |
| Workflow | Loraine Lab Workflow [ 18284 ] | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 18952 ] |
| Workflow | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 18952 ] | Revised Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 21077 ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Sprint | Spring 9 : 25 May to 8 Jun [ 95 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
| Link | This issue relates to IGBF-1553 [ IGBF-1553 ] |
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Assignee | Nowlan Freese [ nfreese ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Another idea:
PLOS Computational Biology - Software - https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007747
Galaxy papers are in:
9x Bioinformatics
4x Genome Research
3x Gigascience
3x Computational Biology
2x BMC Bioinformatics
Note: Two of the Gigascience papers were from the last 3 years (more recent). Lots of publications in Bioinformatics, though some of them are 2 page application notes.
I am leaning towards Gigascience, as you mentioned a positive experience with the journal.
Computational Biology may also be applicable, and I have published with PLOS previously.
Both journals have a similar impact factor. I don't think it will be difficult to reformat the paper for either journal.
[~aloraine] what are your thoughts?
| Sprint | Spring 9 : 25 May to 8 Jun [ 95 ] | Spring 9 : 25 May to 8 Jun, Summer 1: 8 Jun - 19 Jun [ 95, 96 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
I agree - let's go with Gigascience!
I have made a few changes to the paper to properly format it for GigaScience. The abstract is slightly reformatted with a few edits. Background/results is now under the heading Findings. Implementation is now under Methods, and is at the end of the paper. References have been updated to match GigaScience recommendations.
GigaScience requests individual figure files (Dropbox > IGB > Manuscripts > biovizConnect > figures).
The updated paper is in (Dropbox > IGB > Manuscripts > biovizConnect > gigaScience) along with a cover letter.
Assigning to [~aloraine] to submit the paper.
| Assignee | Nowlan Freese [ nfreese ] | Ann Loraine [ aloraine ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
Technical Note instructions: https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/pages/technical_note
General instructions: https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/pages/instructions_to_authors
Submission site: https://www.editorialmanager.com/giga/default.aspx
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] |
| Status | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] |
| Status | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] |
| Status | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] |
| Status | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] |
| Status | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
Uploaded and submitted to GigaScience as a Technical Note. PDF from the GigaScience Web site is saved in the DropBox.
Paper was originally formatted for BMC Bioinformatics, but I think it may be worth submitting to:
GigaScience - Technical Note - https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/9/4/giaa025/5813097?searchresult=1