Uploaded image for project: 'IGB'
  1. IGB
  2. IGBF-3245

Investigate: Why do coverage graphs look different?

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: To-Do (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The new time course dataset from Mark Johnson lab was generated using a different sequencing protocol - paired-end strand specific versus paired-end non-strand specific as in earlier sequencing runs.

      For some reason, the coverage graphs we made look different, with different patterns of peaks and valleys.

      For an example, see:

      https://bitbucket.org/hotpollen/splicing-analysis/src/main/GenomeBrowserImages/TimeCourseVsOlderData-CoverageGraphProfileDifference.png

      For this task, please investigate why this is the case.

      For your reference, coverage graph generation code is here:

      https://bitbucket.org/hotpollen/splicing-analysis/src/main/src/bamCoverage.sh
      in

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            ann.loraine Ann Loraine created issue -
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Epic Link IGBF-2993 [ 21429 ]
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Link This issue relates to IGBF-3244 [ IGBF-3244 ]
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Sprint Spring 3 2023 Feb 1 [ 163 ]

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                ann.loraine Ann Loraine
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated: