Uploaded image for project: 'IGB'
  1. IGB
  2. IGBF-3262

Make Markdown showing DESeq analysis of Muday time course SL5 data

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Please review: https://bitbucket.org/hotpollen/flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/Counts/ClusterCounts.Rmd

      Glorias Requests:

      1. PCA plots for all 3 genotypes at control and stress temperatures in each time point (so, this would be 4 PCA plots). Rob had sent graphs with all 4 time points, 3 genotypes and 2 temperatures and that was hard to parse out. Rasha showed her data with individual time points and it was much easier to follow.

      2. I know that pipelines/analysis procedures evolve. Can you look at the analysis of DE genes with temperature within each genotype and make sure we have a final set of data. This is pertinent to compare with number 3! I think we decided that IQR 50 was the best metric

      3. Analyses of DE genes between genotypes. We have not yet seen those genes for the current analysis pipeline and want to match those up with genes in Number 2. Since there are 3 genotypes, I guess the way this needs to be done is 3 pairwise comparisons at each temperature (so 6 comparisons), but if you all have thoughts on another way, we'd love to hear them.

      4. Volcano plots with lines drawn at p values (not adjusted p-values) less than 0.05 and Log fold change (base 2) of 1.0. This would be comparing temperature response within genotypes (so 3 plots) and differences between genotypes at each temperature (so 6 plots).

      5. We are excited to look at this data in IGB, so that is another thing we want to do and look at regions where there are DE genes.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            ann.loraine Ann Loraine created issue -
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Epic Link IGBF-2993 [ 21429 ]
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Link This issue relates to IGBF-3250 [ IGBF-3250 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Assignee Molly Davis [ molly ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status To-Do [ 10305 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Attachment Muday_SL5_RNAseq_Analysis.Rmd [ 17709 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Attachment salmon.merged.gene_counts-SL5.tsv [ 17710 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Attachment metafile.tsv [ 17711 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Attachment metafile.tsv [ 17711 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Attachment Muday_SL5_RNAseq_Analysis.Rmd [ 17709 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Attachment salmon.merged.gene_counts-SL5.tsv [ 17710 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Comment [ *Update:*

            * Created Markdown:
            Location: https://bitbucket.org/mdavis4290/analysis-flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/

            Commit:
            https://bitbucket.org/mdavis4290/analysis-flavonoid-rnaseq/commits/07a47f479ce64d3e8ee51bebc92eca19cb434749

            Comments:
            * I had to update the names for both files to match, here are the files I am using with the markdown:
            Location: https://bitbucket.org/mdavis4290/analysis-flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/
            * Might need to use 'cooksCutoff' and 'independentFiltering'
            * Am I grouping factors correctly and adding the right factors together in the PCA plots?

            [~RobertReid] Let me know what you think! ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Comment [ [~aloraine] Ok I created a repository for them here: https://bitbucket.org/mdavis4290/analysis-flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/ ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Description Please review: https://bitbucket.org/hotpollen/flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/Counts/ClusterCounts.Rmd Please review: https://bitbucket.org/hotpollen/flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/Counts/ClusterCounts.Rmd


            1. PCA plots for all 3 genotypes at control and stress temperatures in each time point (so, this would be 4 PCA plots). Rob had sent graphs with all 4 time points, 3 genotypes and 2 temperatures and that was hard to parse out. Rasha showed her data with individual time points and it was much easier to follow.

            2. I know that pipelines/analysis procedures evolve. Can you look at the analysis of DE genes with temperature within each genotype and make sure we have a final set of data. This is pertinent to compare with number 3! I think we decided that IQR 50 was the best metric

            3. Analyses of DE genes between genotypes. We have not yet seen those genes for the current analysis pipeline and want to match those up with genes in Number 2. Since there are 3 genotypes, I guess the way this needs to be done is 3 pairwise comparisons at each temperature (so 6 comparisons), but if you all have thoughts on another way, we'd love to hear them.

            4. Volcano plots with lines drawn at p values (not adjusted p-values) less than 0.05 and Log fold change (base 2) of 1.0. This would be comparing temperature response within genotypes (so 3 plots) and differences between genotypes at each temperature (so 6 plots).

            5. We are excited to look at this data in IGB, so that is another thing we want to do and look at regions where there are DE genes.
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Description Please review: https://bitbucket.org/hotpollen/flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/Counts/ClusterCounts.Rmd


            1. PCA plots for all 3 genotypes at control and stress temperatures in each time point (so, this would be 4 PCA plots). Rob had sent graphs with all 4 time points, 3 genotypes and 2 temperatures and that was hard to parse out. Rasha showed her data with individual time points and it was much easier to follow.

            2. I know that pipelines/analysis procedures evolve. Can you look at the analysis of DE genes with temperature within each genotype and make sure we have a final set of data. This is pertinent to compare with number 3! I think we decided that IQR 50 was the best metric

            3. Analyses of DE genes between genotypes. We have not yet seen those genes for the current analysis pipeline and want to match those up with genes in Number 2. Since there are 3 genotypes, I guess the way this needs to be done is 3 pairwise comparisons at each temperature (so 6 comparisons), but if you all have thoughts on another way, we'd love to hear them.

            4. Volcano plots with lines drawn at p values (not adjusted p-values) less than 0.05 and Log fold change (base 2) of 1.0. This would be comparing temperature response within genotypes (so 3 plots) and differences between genotypes at each temperature (so 6 plots).

            5. We are excited to look at this data in IGB, so that is another thing we want to do and look at regions where there are DE genes.
            Please review: https://bitbucket.org/hotpollen/flavonoid-rnaseq/src/main/Counts/ClusterCounts.Rmd

            Glorias Requests:

            1. PCA plots for all 3 genotypes at control and stress temperatures in each time point (so, this would be 4 PCA plots). Rob had sent graphs with all 4 time points, 3 genotypes and 2 temperatures and that was hard to parse out. Rasha showed her data with individual time points and it was much easier to follow.

            2. I know that pipelines/analysis procedures evolve. Can you look at the analysis of DE genes with temperature within each genotype and make sure we have a final set of data. This is pertinent to compare with number 3! I think we decided that IQR 50 was the best metric

            3. Analyses of DE genes between genotypes. We have not yet seen those genes for the current analysis pipeline and want to match those up with genes in Number 2. Since there are 3 genotypes, I guess the way this needs to be done is 3 pairwise comparisons at each temperature (so 6 comparisons), but if you all have thoughts on another way, we'd love to hear them.

            4. Volcano plots with lines drawn at p values (not adjusted p-values) less than 0.05 and Log fold change (base 2) of 1.0. This would be comparing temperature response within genotypes (so 3 plots) and differences between genotypes at each temperature (so 6 plots).

            5. We are excited to look at this data in IGB, so that is another thing we want to do and look at regions where there are DE genes.
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Story Points 2 5
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Link This issue is blocked by IGBF-3277 [ IGBF-3277 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] To-Do [ 10305 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status To-Do [ 10305 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Epic Link IGBF-2993 [ 21429 ] IGBF-3277 [ 22158 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] To-Do [ 10305 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status To-Do [ 10305 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Status Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ]
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] Closed [ 6 ]

              People

              • Assignee:
                Mdavis4290 Molly Davis
                Reporter:
                ann.loraine Ann Loraine
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: