Details
-
Type:
Task
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:Sprint 17
Description
This story was created to serve as a reminder for the task of testing the bed parser since refactoring has recently taken place.
Test all things relating to Bed files, including:
-Loading a Bed file from a Quickload site, from a URL, and from the Desktop
-Bed vs. Bed detail?
-Selection Info?
-Bed Track Operations
-Any other bed related issues
Attachments
Activity
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Status | Open [ 1 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
Sprint | Sprint 14 [ 19 ] |
Sprint | Sprint 15 [ 20 ] |
Rank | Ranked higher |
Comment | [ My testing verifies that IGB is still stable and operating as expected after the refactoring. Since this story is resolved it will now be closed. ] |
Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
Sprint | Sprint 15 [ 20 ] |
Sprint | Sprint 16 [ 21 ] |
Rank | Ranked higher |
Epic Link | IGBF-99 [ 14534 ] |
Sprint | Sprint 16 [ 21 ] |
Sprint | Sprint 17 [ 22 ] |
Rank | Ranked higher |
Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
Workflow | Loraine Lab Workflow [ 15705 ] | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 19380 ] |
Workflow | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 19380 ] | Revised Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 21497 ] |
I noticed that many genomes listed in
IGBF-406are now not being labeled by default again. The GFF files are still being labeled by default it seems, which makes me think that this issue reopened due to refactoring of the bed parser.I am holding off on closing this issue at the moment.