Details
-
Type:
Task
-
Status: In Progress (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:0.5
Description
IGB has an option called "Filter..." in the track context menu which allows a user to filter models by certain fields.
We should make sure that the names of these filters are clear to the user. We may also want to think about adding some type of short description in a tooltip or info button for each filter.
Attachments
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Epic Link | IGBF-594 [ 15667 ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Rank | Ranked lower |
| Rank | Ranked lower |
| Sprint | Sprint 26 [ 34 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 27 [ 35 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
After reviewing the filter names for bed and bam files I believe that there is a little bit of work to do to make these a little more clear for the user. I don't think that all the names need to be changed, but we may be able to adjust a few things here to make their functions more clear to the users.
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Open [ 1 ] |
| Assignee | Mason Meyer [ mason ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 27 [ 35 ] | Backlog Grooming [ 36 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 28 [ 36 ] | Backlog Grooming [ 37 ] |
| Sprint | Backlog Grooming [ 37 ] | Backlog Grooming 2 [ 38 ] |
| Summary | Make sure that Filter names in IGB are clear to the user | Make sure that gilter names in IGB are clear to the user |
| Summary | Make sure that gilter names in IGB are clear to the user | Make sure that filter names in IGB are clear to the user |
| Story Points | 0.5 |
| Rank | Ranked lower |
| Sprint | Sprint 30 [ 38 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 31 [ 39 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Sprint | Sprint 31 [ 39 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 32 [ 40 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Sprint | Sprint 32 [ 40 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Epic Link | IGBF-594 [ 15667 ] |
| Workflow | Loraine Lab Workflow [ 16319 ] | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 18782 ] |
| Workflow | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 18782 ] | Revised Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 20904 ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
I reviewed the filters available for bed and bam files:
Bed: Reads with gaps, Reads with no gaps, and Score
-For the Bed filters, I think it is odd that filters for bed files would be read related. It seems that the read related filters should apply to Bam files.
Bam: Average Quality Score, Filter by Strand, Mapping Quality Score, Mismatch, Multi-Mapper, Paired End Mates, Perfect Match, Reads with gaps, Reads with no gaps, Run number, Score, Single Mapper, Technical Duplicate
-For the Bam filters I believe that many of these filter names make sense. We may want to order Multi Mapper underneath Single Mapper though to illustrate that it is either multi-mapped or single mapped. I'm not sure what the difference is though between average quality score and score either. I also don't understand why filter by strand is only a filter for bam files, why not bed files too? I also do not understand what the filter Perfect Match does.