Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Blocker
-
Resolution: Done
-
Labels:
Description
Please add back UCSC to Data Source in IGB 9.1.6
Reporter: Maha Abdellatif
E-mail: abdellma@njms.rutgers.edu
Attachments
Issue Links
Activity
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Description |
Please add pack UCSC to Data Source in IGB 9.1.6 *Reporter*: Maha Abdellatif *E-mail*: [mailto:abdellma@njms.rutgers.edu] |
Please add back UCSC to Data Source in IGB 9.1.6
*Reporter*: Maha Abdellatif *E-mail*: [mailto:abdellma@njms.rutgers.edu] |
Priority | Blocker [ 1 ] |
Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] |
Status | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] |
Status | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] |
Status | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] |
Status | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] |
Status | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
Status | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
Status | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
Assignee | Ann Loraine [ aloraine ] | Nowlan Freese [ nfreese ] |
This is most likely in reference to the removal of UCSC DAS support in IGB 9.1.6.
IGBF-2473IGBF-2474[~aloraine] - Was this user contacted to inform them that we no longer support DAS?
I'm unclear if there is any kind of workaround for this issue as we have removed the DAS code from IGB. They could perhaps download the necessary annotation files from the table browser?