Uploaded image for project: 'IGB'
  1. IGB
  2. IGBF-1309

inverse log operations make no sense

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The inverse log functions for graph tracks don't make sense.

      Is it taking the inverse of the log ? If so, its doing it wrong.
      Is it taking the log of the inverse? nope.
      What does inverse log mean?
      The user guide has no info on this.

      We an take the inverse (which does seem to working) of the log (which does seem to be working) and we get the values we expect. And these values are very different from the values generated by inverse log.

      See the instructions on the track operations release testing page.
      https://wiki.transvar.org/display/ITD/Track+Operators
      Section: Single Track Operations - part 4 - inverse logs

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            ieclabau Ivory Blakley (Inactive) created issue -
            ieclabau Ivory Blakley (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue relates to IGBF-1319 [ IGBF-1319 ]
            ieclabau Ivory Blakley (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to IGBF-1340 [ IGBF-1340 ]
            ieclabau Ivory Blakley (Inactive) made changes -
            Description The inverse log functions for graph tracks don't make sense.

            Is it taking the inverse of the log ? If so, its doing it wrong.
            Is it taking the log of the inverse? nope.
            What does inverse log mean?
            The user guide has no info on this.

            We an take the inverse (which does seem to working) of the log (which does seem to be working) and we get the values we expect. And these values are very different from the values generated by inverse log.

            See the instructions on the track operations release testing page.
            https://wiki.transvar.org/display/ITD/Track+Operators
            The inverse log functions for graph tracks don't make sense.

            Is it taking the inverse of the log ? If so, its doing it wrong.
            Is it taking the log of the inverse? nope.
            What does inverse log mean?
            The user guide has no info on this.

            We an take the inverse (which does seem to working) of the log (which does seem to be working) and we get the values we expect. And these values are very different from the values generated by inverse log.

            See the instructions on the track operations release testing page.
            https://wiki.transvar.org/display/ITD/Track+Operators
            Section: Single Track Operations - part 4 - inverse logs
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Workflow Loraine Lab Workflow [ 18000 ] Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 18867 ]
            ann.loraine Ann Loraine made changes -
            Workflow Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 18867 ] Revised Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 20992 ]
            Status Open [ 1 ] To-Do [ 10305 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Link This issue relates to IGBF-2134 [ IGBF-2134 ]
            Hide
            nfreese Nowlan Freese added a comment -

            Fixed in IGBF-2666

            Show
            nfreese Nowlan Freese added a comment - Fixed in IGBF-2666
            Hide
            nfreese Nowlan Freese added a comment -

            For clarification, the inverse log is equivalent to an antilog.

            Show
            nfreese Nowlan Freese added a comment - For clarification, the inverse log is equivalent to an antilog.
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Link This issue is duplicated by IGBF-2666 [ IGBF-2666 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Assignee Ann Loraine [ aloraine ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status To-Do [ 10305 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Status Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] Closed [ 6 ]

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                ieclabau Ivory Blakley (Inactive)
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: