Details
-
Type:
Task
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:7
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6, Fall 5 Nov 9 - Nov 20, Fall 6 Nov 30 - Dec 11, Fall 7 Dec 14 - Dec 23
Description
Funding for the IGB project expires June 2021, so we are preparing a grant application requesting more funding to continue supporting and developing IGB.
To help make the case for why continuing the IGB project benefits science, we need to collect testimonials from users describing how they have used IGB.
In addition, we need to get a better sense of what experienced IGB users would like us to do during the next period of funding.
For this task, update the spreadsheet (created by Jay during his summer internship) with any newly published articles that cited one of the three IGB papers. (See IGBF-2392)
Next, contact the corresponding author(s) and the first author(s) to request a letter of support. For each group of authors contacted, keep track of the correspondence using a Google Drive folder set up by [~aloraine]. Also, for each contact, you'll "cc" [~aloraine] and include her in the discussion – this is key because it shows that we are super serious and sincere about getting people's help and feedback.
When you start, please consult with [~aloraine] about the process. We need to be sensitive to the fact that people are very busy, but, at the same time, IGB is available free of charge, so it is not too much of an "ask" to try to get some feedback and support from people whose work has benefitted from being able to use IGB.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
-
- Closed
-
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Epic Link | IGBF-1765 [ 17855 ] |
| Link | This issue relates to IGBF-2544 [ IGBF-2544 ] |
| Description | Funding for the IGB project expires June 2021, so we are preparing a grant application requesting more funding to continue supporting and developing IGB. |
| Assignee | Ann Loraine [ aloraine ] |
| Description | Funding for the IGB project expires June 2021, so we are preparing a grant application requesting more funding to continue supporting and developing IGB. |
Funding for the IGB project expires June 2021, so we are preparing a grant application requesting more funding to continue supporting and developing IGB.
To help make the case for why continuing the IGB project benefits science, we need to collect testimonials from users describing how they have used IGB. In addition, we need to get a better sense of what experienced IGB users would like us to do during the next period of funding. For this task, update the spreadsheet (created by Jay during his summer internship) with any newly published articles that cited one of the three IGB papers. (See Next, contact the corresponding author(s) and the first author(s) to request a letter of support. For each group of authors contacted, keep track of the correspondence. When you start, please consult with [~aloraine] about the process. We need to be sensitive to the fact that people are very busy, but, at the same time, IGB is available free of charge, so it is not too much of an "ask" to try to get some feedback and support from people whose work has benefitted from being able to use IGB. |
| Description |
Funding for the IGB project expires June 2021, so we are preparing a grant application requesting more funding to continue supporting and developing IGB.
To help make the case for why continuing the IGB project benefits science, we need to collect testimonials from users describing how they have used IGB. In addition, we need to get a better sense of what experienced IGB users would like us to do during the next period of funding. For this task, update the spreadsheet (created by Jay during his summer internship) with any newly published articles that cited one of the three IGB papers. (See Next, contact the corresponding author(s) and the first author(s) to request a letter of support. For each group of authors contacted, keep track of the correspondence. When you start, please consult with [~aloraine] about the process. We need to be sensitive to the fact that people are very busy, but, at the same time, IGB is available free of charge, so it is not too much of an "ask" to try to get some feedback and support from people whose work has benefitted from being able to use IGB. |
Funding for the IGB project expires June 2021, so we are preparing a grant application requesting more funding to continue supporting and developing IGB.
To help make the case for why continuing the IGB project benefits science, we need to collect testimonials from users describing how they have used IGB. In addition, we need to get a better sense of what experienced IGB users would like us to do during the next period of funding. For this task, update the spreadsheet (created by Jay during his summer internship) with any newly published articles that cited one of the three IGB papers. (See Next, contact the corresponding author(s) and the first author(s) to request a letter of support. For each group of authors contacted, keep track of the correspondence using a Google Drive folder set up by [~aloraine]. Also, for each contact, you'll "cc" [~aloraine] and include her in the discussion -- this is key because it shows that we are super serious and sincere about getting people's help and feedback. When you start, please consult with [~aloraine] about the process. We need to be sensitive to the fact that people are very busy, but, at the same time, IGB is available free of charge, so it is not too much of an "ask" to try to get some feedback and support from people whose work has benefitted from being able to use IGB. |
| Assignee | Rachel Weidenhammer [ rweidenh ] |
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Sprint | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct [ 104 ] | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23 [ 104, 106 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Story Points | 3 | 5 |
| Comment |
[ Absolutely. Versus waiting until next week to get started, would you like me to split my time between the on-boarding and this ticket each day?
cc: [~aloraine] ] |
| Comment |
[ When you are finished with the on-boarding issues, could you help with this?
cc: [~rweidenh] ] |
| Comment | [ * Why does the template letter have specific information about a paper in it? ] |
| Comment |
[ [~aloraine], for your review:
If you would like to read and make comments on the first rough draft below Link to the first document draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ulcBvyLzc3F8ks1C74SLhEYjTIacRyq1p8K9vrwAj5s/edit?usp=sharing Link to the drive containing letter drafts https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pf7asCaelA24HH3495eiha88FEzscNj8?usp=sharing ] |
| Story Points | 5 | 7 |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] |
| Assignee | Rachel Weidenhammer [ rweidenh ] |
| Sprint | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23 [ 104, 106 ] | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6 [ 104, 106, 107 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Assignee | Rachel Weidenhammer [ rweidenh ] |
| Status | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] |
| Status | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Sprint | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6 [ 104, 106, 107 ] | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6, Fall 5 Nov 9 - Nov 20 [ 104, 106, 107, 108 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
| Sprint | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6, Fall 5 Nov 9 - Nov 20 [ 104, 106, 107, 108 ] | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6, Fall 5 Nov 9 - Nov 20, Fall 6 Nov 23 - Dec 4 [ 104, 106, 107, 108, 109 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
In progress: Spreadsheet organizing a table of organisms, the number of papers using data from that organism, grouped by organism type.
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
| Sprint | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6, Fall 5 Nov 9 - Nov 20, Fall 6 Nov 30 - Dec 11 [ 104, 106, 107, 108, 109 ] | Fall 2: 28 Sep - 9 Oct, Fall 3: Oct 12 - Oct 23, Fall 4 Oct 26 - Nov 6, Fall 5 Nov 9 - Nov 20, Fall 6 Nov 30 - Dec 11, Fall 7 Dec 14 - Dec 23 [ 104, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
Work done thus far meets our needs. Moving to done. Thank you Logan Weidenhammer!
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] |
| Status | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] |
| Status | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] |
| Status | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] |
| Status | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] |
| Status | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Assignee | Rachel Weidenhammer [ rweidenh ] | Nowlan Freese [ nfreese ] |
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Closed [ 6 ] | To-Do [ 10305 ] |
| Status | To-Do [ 10305 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Assignee | Nowlan Freese [ nfreese ] | Rachel Weidenhammer [ rweidenh ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] |
| Status | Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] |
| Status | First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] |
| Status | Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] |
| Status | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] |
| Status | Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
[~aloraine],
All letter drafts from 2020 papers are completed and moved to "Needs Review" in the google drive folder: 'Contacting Users'
The 'How do biologists use IGB in their research? ' document is also complete for the papers published in 2020.
Note: There are a couple of papers which cite IGB, but in the body of the paper actually reference IGV. Those letters have been left in "In Progress". I can go in and delete them if you would like.