Uploaded image for project: 'IGB'
  1. IGB
  2. IGBF-2922

Explain and/or revise architecture diagram (fig 1)

        Details

        • Type: Task
        • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
        • Priority: Major
        • Resolution: Done
        • Affects Version/s: None
        • Fix Version/s: None
        • Labels:
          None

          Description

          I think maybe Figure 1 - the architecture diagram - needs revision.

          The client / server dividing line is a bit confusing. IGB is show on the server side of the dividing line, which does not make sense to me because IGB is not a client-side program. Similarly, "template" is on the client side of the dividing line, but Django templates are entirely server-side. That's the entire point of them, I thought - they are never exposed to the Web browser.

          The meaning of the two boxes on the server side is also confusing. Are those boxes meant to make the figure look nicer, or do they have a meaning with respect to the architecture?

            Attachments

            1. 1.jpg
              347 kB
              Ann Loraine
            2. Figure1.png
              336 kB
              Ann Loraine

              Activity

              Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
              Hide
              Permalink
              ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment -

              Made a new version, which I hope is better. It is attached.

              Show
              ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment - Made a new version, which I hope is better. It is attached.
              Hide
              Permalink
              ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment -

              Previous version

              Show
              ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment - Previous version
              Hide
              Permalink
              ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment -

              Note: If reviewers ask, we can further improve the figure for clarity.

              Show
              ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment - Note: If reviewers ask, we can further improve the figure for clarity.

                People

                • Assignee:
                  ann.loraine Ann Loraine
                  Reporter:
                  ann.loraine Ann Loraine
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  1 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: