Uploaded image for project: 'IGB'
  1. IGB
  2. IGBF-2923

Improve Make scaled coverage graph interface

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Story Points:
      3
    • Sprint:
      Fall 1 2021 Aug 16 - Aug 27, Fall 2 2021 Aug 30 - Sep10, Fall 3 2021 Sep 13 - Sep 24, Fall 4 2021 Sep 27 - Oct 8, Fall 5 2021 Oct 11 - Oct 22

      Description

      The "make scaled coverage graph" interface has several question mark (help) icons next to text entry boxes.

      When I tried to click them to view help information, nothing happened. Hovering the mouse over them also did nothing. They do not seem to have any function.

      If these question marks do nothing, they should be removed. Were these meant as a placeholders? If yes, that's fine, but leaving them without any function is not good - it undermines users' trust that the site is reliable and well-designed.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          karthik Karthik Raveendran added a comment -

          Pushed changes to repo. Commit in branch IGBF-2923

          Th conditional statement that handles input fields did not include FolderOutput field which is added in this commit.

          Test Protocol:
          Search for a .fasta file in Home directory and run Analyse from right-click menu. Click on the "Find enriched sequence motifs" button and check if the Output Folder Name field is present. Try running the analysis and if it appears as 'Submitted' in the Analysis History page

          Show
          karthik Karthik Raveendran added a comment - Pushed changes to repo. Commit in branch IGBF-2923 Th conditional statement that handles input fields did not include FolderOutput field which is added in this commit. Test Protocol: Search for a .fasta file in Home directory and run Analyse from right-click menu. Click on the "Find enriched sequence motifs" button and check if the Output Folder Name field is present. Try running the analysis and if it appears as 'Submitted' in the Analysis History page
          Hide
          ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment -

          Passes review as per discussion during Oct 19 scrum meeting.

          Show
          ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment - Passes review as per discussion during Oct 19 scrum meeting.
          Show
          nfreese Nowlan Freese added a comment - Merged https://bitbucket.org/nfreese/bioviz-connect/pull-requests/261/igbf-2923-fix-folderoutput-input-field-ui?link_source=email
          Hide
          ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment -

          Deployed for testing to https://bvctest6.bioviz.org.

          Show
          ann.loraine Ann Loraine added a comment - Deployed for testing to https://bvctest6.bioviz.org .
          Hide
          nfreese Nowlan Freese added a comment -

          The output folder name field is present, and when the analysis was run the folder was created and named correctly (and the analysis completed correctly).

          Closing issue.

          Show
          nfreese Nowlan Freese added a comment - The output folder name field is present, and when the analysis was run the folder was created and named correctly (and the analysis completed correctly). Closing issue.

            People

            • Assignee:
              karthik Karthik Raveendran
              Reporter:
              ann.loraine Ann Loraine
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: