I'm confused about there being multiple certificates returned by the site. My understanding from having requested and installed certificates is that you only get one! And you can often purchase a "star" certificate that will cover every subdomain, e.g., foo.bioviz.org or bar.bioviz.org would be validated the same "star" certificate.
However, looking at the above certificates mentioned in the previous comments, it looks like the site is using a public service ("let's encrypt") that provides certificates for free, in some kind of dynamic way. I wonder if the site's configuration is messed up or incorrect in a minor way that affects IGB and openssl, but not the other applications, explaining why the site maintainers perhaps never noticed the problem. For this latter task, let's make a new ticket to investigate "let's encrypt".
Maybe we ought to investigate how the "let's encrypt" configuration is done? Also, [~aloraine] is interested in how "let's encrypt" works in case we want to use for our Web applications, as well. Why? It's because the lab has multiple domains, for only a few of which do we currently purchase certificates, as they are costly. If we knew how to use "let's encrypt," we could provide SSL level security for every site, not just "bioviz" and the few others for which we purchase certificates.
found.' This seems to be an SSL validation related issue, so we be able to avoid this error by altering the current HTTPS connection configuration.