Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:

      Description

      Situation: psl files (EST and mRNA) have some kind of off by one error. The listed end position is +1 compared to where the annotations actually end (positive strand alignments).

      For example, if a mRNA on the positive strand says that it starts at 100 and ends at 150, in IGB the annotation will be drawn overlapping bases 100 - 149. If on the negative strand the IGB reported start is +1 to where the annotation is actually drawn. This indicates that the tEnd (https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format2) column is effectively +1 compared to what is actually drawn in IGB. Note that the annotations in IGB appear to be drawn in the correct location, i.e. intron exon boundaries line up correctly. The only issue is that the IGB reported start/end is off by one, depending on positive/negative strand.

      Task: Investigate why this issue is occurring. If the issue can be fixed update this ticket.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            nfreese Nowlan Freese created issue -
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Epic Link IGBF-1765 [ 17855 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Link This issue relates to IGBF-3330 [ IGBF-3330 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Description Situation:

            Task:
            Situation: psl files (EST and mRNA) have some kind of off by one error. The listed end position is +1 compared to where the annotations actually end (positive strand alignments).

            For example, if a mRNA on the positive strand says that it starts at 100 and ends at 150, in IGB the annotation will be drawn overlapping bases 100 - 149. If on the negative strand the IGB reported start is +1 to where the annotation is actually drawn. This indicates that the tEnd (https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format2) column is effectively +1 compared to what is actually drawn in IGB. Note that the annotations in IGB appear to be drawn in the correct location, i.e. intron exon boundaries line up correctly. The only issue is that the IGB reported start/end is off by one, depending on positive/negative strand.

            This issue is present in older psl files (M_musculus_Dec_2011) and on older versions of IGB (tested 9.0.2).

            Task: Investigate why this issue is occurring. If the issue can be fixed update this ticket.
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Description Situation: psl files (EST and mRNA) have some kind of off by one error. The listed end position is +1 compared to where the annotations actually end (positive strand alignments).

            For example, if a mRNA on the positive strand says that it starts at 100 and ends at 150, in IGB the annotation will be drawn overlapping bases 100 - 149. If on the negative strand the IGB reported start is +1 to where the annotation is actually drawn. This indicates that the tEnd (https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format2) column is effectively +1 compared to what is actually drawn in IGB. Note that the annotations in IGB appear to be drawn in the correct location, i.e. intron exon boundaries line up correctly. The only issue is that the IGB reported start/end is off by one, depending on positive/negative strand.

            This issue is present in older psl files (M_musculus_Dec_2011) and on older versions of IGB (tested 9.0.2).

            Task: Investigate why this issue is occurring. If the issue can be fixed update this ticket.
            *Situation*: psl files (EST and mRNA) have some kind of off by one error. The listed end position is +1 compared to where the annotations actually end (positive strand alignments).

            For example, if a mRNA on the positive strand says that it starts at 100 and ends at 150, in IGB the annotation will be drawn overlapping bases 100 - 149. If on the negative strand the IGB reported start is +1 to where the annotation is actually drawn. This indicates that the tEnd (https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format2) column is effectively +1 compared to what is actually drawn in IGB. Note that the annotations in IGB appear to be drawn in the correct location, i.e. intron exon boundaries line up correctly. The only issue is that the IGB reported start/end is off by one, depending on positive/negative strand.

            *Task*: Investigate why this issue is occurring. If the issue can be fixed update this ticket.
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Attachment M_musculus_Jun_2020_TEST_mrna.psl [ 17894 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Attachment negative.png [ 17895 ]
            Attachment positive.png [ 17896 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Attachment negative.png [ 17895 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Attachment positive.png [ 17896 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Attachment negative.png [ 17897 ]
            Attachment positive.png [ 17898 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Labels intermediate
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Sprint Summer 4 2023 June 26 [ 173 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Sprint Summer 1 [ 195 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Sprint Summer 1 [ 195 ] Spring 10 [ 194 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Rank Ranked lower
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Sprint Spring 10 [ 194 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Sprint Summer 1 [ 195 ]
            nfreese Nowlan Freese made changes -
            Rank Ranked higher
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi [ jsirigin ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status To-Do [ 10305 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] To-Do [ 10305 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status To-Do [ 10305 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Needs 1st Level Review [ 10005 ] First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status First Level Review in Progress [ 10301 ] Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Ready for Pull Request [ 10304 ] Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reviewing Pull Request [ 10303 ] Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Merged Needs Testing [ 10002 ] Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ]
            jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Post-merge Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] Closed [ 6 ]

              People

              • Assignee:
                jsirigin Jaya Sravani Sirigineedi (Inactive)
                Reporter:
                nfreese Nowlan Freese
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: