Details
-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: 8.4.0 Major Release
-
Labels:None
-
Story Points:0.25
-
Epic Link:
-
Sprint:Sprint 21
Description
From Ann:
• If you add a value to a track, there doesn’t seem to be any way to find out what that value was — the name of the new, IGB-generated track doesn’t seem to report the value you added to the graph. The same is true for all the other arithmetic operations. This is very confusing and makes the feature hard to use. The track name should report the operation that was done and the arguments that were used.
Attachments
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Epic Link | IGBF-600 [ 15673 ] |
| Summary | Indicate the Track Operation (including the value) in the Track Label | Indicate the Track Operation performed (including the value) in the Track Label |
| Fix Version/s | 8.3.3 Minor Release [ 10000 ] |
| Story Points | 0.25 |
| Assignee | Tarun Mall [ tmall ] |
| Fix Version/s | 8.4.0 Major Release [ 10001 ] | |
| Fix Version/s | 8.3.4 Minor Release [ 10000 ] |
| Rank | Ranked lower |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Open [ 1 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 19 [ 24 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 20 [ 25 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Open [ 1 ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] |
| Status | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Assignee | Tarun Mall [ tmall ] | Mason Meyer [ mason ] |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Attachment | TrackOperationsInTrackLabels.PNG [ 13039 ] |
| Assignee | Mason Meyer [ mason ] | Ann Loraine [ aloraine ] |
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
Only the name of the data set (not full path) should be shown in the track label. However, when a user selects a track and clicks the “i” (upper right) or selects the “Selection Info” tab, then they should be able to view the full path of the data sets.
The syntax you mentioned is good:
NAME argument [,argument,…]
where NAME is the name of the operation they performed, as displayed in the user interface. The names of operations need to match what the user sees in the UI.
| Assignee | Ann Loraine [ aloraine ] | Mason Meyer [ mason ] |
I have created IGBF-679 to track the issue of the full file path being visible in the track label.
For the current story, we need to change the way track operations and values are displayed in the track label to this:
"Add 50.0: Cold, Control " (Note the space between the track operation and the value, there are no parentheses, and there is a colon directly after the value and a space after the colon; also be sure that you DON'T include the quotation marks in the track label)
Re-assigning to Tarun for changes.
| Assignee | Mason Meyer [ mason ] | Tarun Mall [ tmall ] |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Open [ 1 ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] |
| Status | Pull Request Submitted [ 10101 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 20 [ 25 ] |
| Sprint | Sprint 21 [ 26 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Needs Testing [ 10002 ] | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Assignee | Tarun Mall [ tmall ] | Mason Meyer [ mason ] |
My testing verifies that this issue has been resolved and so it will now be closed.
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Testing In Progress [ 10003 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Workflow | Loraine Lab Workflow [ 15898 ] | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 19466 ] |
| Workflow | Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 19466 ] | Revised Fall 2019 Workflow Update [ 21583 ] |
We should ask Ann for clarification on how the performed track operation, including the value, should be specifically indicated in the track label. Currently it looks like this: "Add(50.0)-RNA-Seq Berry Development / SM / Graph / ripe 2-41, coverage" (see screenshot).
I think this could be optimized to look a little more user friendly, maybe something like this: "Add (50.0): RNA-Seq Berry Development / SM / Graph / ripe 2-41, coverage".
I am assigning to Ann so that she can include her thoughts on this issue.