Uploaded image for project: 'IGB'
  1. IGB
  2. IGBF-3683

Update SRA to use the correct sample codes for Muday lab time course data

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      As shown in the linked ticket, we discovered that 16 samples from the Muday lab's flavonoid time course data were assigned incorrect sample codes.

      We decided to update those records in the SRA to use the correct sample codes.

      Robert Reid is working on that.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment -

            Uhoh, that will get trickier.
            Those columns are not editable via the manage data tabs.

            I will send an email to the SRA to get the Replicate code and library name columns to be in sync with Sample name column.

            Rob

            Show
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment - Uhoh, that will get trickier. Those columns are not editable via the manage data tabs. I will send an email to the SRA to get the Replicate code and library name columns to be in sync with Sample name column. Rob
            Hide
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment -

            Apparently we do not contact the SRA people. The SRA data is correct.
            We need to contact the Biosample people. biosamplehelp@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

            I will ping them and request the changes, as I cannot edit that metatable directly.

            Rob

            Show
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment - Apparently we do not contact the SRA people. The SRA data is correct. We need to contact the Biosample people. biosamplehelp@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov I will ping them and request the changes, as I cannot edit that metatable directly. Rob
            Hide
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment -

            PRJNA1017816-changes2Biosample-reAssignSRR.xlsx

            I have sent them what I think is a simple excel sheet highlighting these differences at the Biosample level.
            We will see how they respond.
            R

            Show
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment - PRJNA1017816-changes2Biosample-reAssignSRR.xlsx I have sent them what I think is a simple excel sheet highlighting these differences at the Biosample level. We will see how they respond. R
            Hide
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment -

            Changes made!
            Time to review if all changes have truly been made.

            For review:

            Check the SRA and its various tables to see if there are any of the mislabels in there.

            Show
            robofjoy Robert Reid added a comment - Changes made! Time to review if all changes have truly been made. For review: Check the SRA and its various tables to see if there are any of the mislabels in there.
            Hide
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis added a comment -

            Review: I use the Run selector for SRP460750 on NCBI to check the newly re-annotated runs. I will review each of the 16 that needed to be re-annoted based on the check SRA markdown created.

            • SRR25478288 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.30.9
            • SRR25478289 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.30.9
            • SRR25478291 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.15.9
            • SRR25478292 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.15.9
            • SRR25478276 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.75.9
            • SRR25478277 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.75.9
            • SRR25478278 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.45.9
            • SRR25478279 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.45.9
            • SRR25478272 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.30.9
            • SRR25478273 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.30.9
            • SRR25478274 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.15.9
            • SRR25478275 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.15.9
            • SRR25478259 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.75.9
            • SRR25478260 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.75.9
            • SRR25478261 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.45.9
            • SRR25478262 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.45.9

            After checking each of the samples that need to be re-annotated on SRA I see no problem with the data. Assigning ticket back to Dr. Reid to finalize and move to done! Then Once this ticket is closed new tickets can be made to rerun the new re-annotated data through the pipeline again.

            Show
            Mdavis4290 Molly Davis added a comment - Review : I use the Run selector for SRP460750 on NCBI to check the newly re-annotated runs. I will review each of the 16 that needed to be re-annoted based on the check SRA markdown created. SRR25478288 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.30.9 SRR25478289 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.30.9 SRR25478291 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.15.9 SRR25478292 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.15.9 SRR25478276 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.75.9 SRR25478277 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.75.9 SRR25478278 was re-annotated with sample code V.34.45.9 SRR25478279 was re-annotated with sample code V.28.45.9 SRR25478272 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.30.9 SRR25478273 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.30.9 SRR25478274 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.15.9 SRR25478275 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.15.9 SRR25478259 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.75.9 SRR25478260 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.75.9 SRR25478261 was re-annotated with sample code F.34.45.9 SRR25478262 was re-annotated with sample code F.28.45.9 After checking each of the samples that need to be re-annotated on SRA I see no problem with the data. Assigning ticket back to Dr. Reid to finalize and move to done! Then Once this ticket is closed new tickets can be made to rerun the new re-annotated data through the pipeline again.

              People

              • Assignee:
                robofjoy Robert Reid
                Reporter:
                ann.loraine Ann Loraine
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: